CoCourtsareASham.com

    Magistrate Terry Tomsick


The Colorado Courts Cannot Follow the Law


Forums Latest Postings*

Please visit this the Know your Courts! web site as well. This web site provides a detailed history of how the attorney complaint process works in the state of Colorado which is basically non-existent.



Support the Colorado Judicial Accountability Act of 2008!

First of all, this web site is not affiliated with the Colorado Court System. This site is my opinions on the Colorado Court system as protected by my First Amendment rights of free speech. Do not take anything on this web site as legal advice.

I have established this web site site since in my opinion Magistrate Terry Tomsick of the Denver County Court system cannot follow the laws that are clearly outlined in the Colorado Statutes. Moreover, I filed a complaint against each judge and in my opinion Colorado's judicial review is nothing more than an exercise to say they "investigated" the complaint.

I file a small claims action in Colorado. [October 2, 2002]
Strictly adhering to Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure, I file a small claims suit in the proper jurisdiction. The trial was scheduled for November 13, 2002.

Magistrate Terry Tomsick dismisses the case without prejudice. [November 4, 2002]
Even though I followed procedure, Magistrate Tomsick dismisses case without prejudice. Evidently Magistrate Tomsick is unaware of of Colorado Rules of Civil Procedures Chapter 5 Rule 41 that states:

It is error to dismiss where plaintiffs are seeking to proceed. Where no party has sought a dismissal, plaintiffs are seeking to proceed, no hearing is had on the question of justifiable cause for dismissal and no findings of wilful default are made by the court, it is error for a trial court to dismiss the action. Levine v. Colorado Transp. Co., 163 Colo. 215, 429 P.2d 274 (1967); Maxwell v. W.K.A. Inc., 728 P.2d 321 (Colo. App. 1986).

I show up for the trial. [November 13, 2002]
Unfortunately, the courts did not give me ample warning that they unlawfully dismissed the case so I showed up for my trial. I was then informed that my case had been dismissed. I asked to see Magistrate Tomsick. I was informed that she was not in the courthouse. I asked why did she make a ruling on my case when it was obvious she probably wasn't scheduled to hear my trial. I received the clerks favorite answer: "I don't know". I then looked at the case file and I noticed Magistrate Tomsick made contact with the defendant's which is unlawful ex-parte communication. In addition, the case file said the case was dismissed due to an arbitration clause. There was never an arbitration clause between myself and the defendants. Where Magistrate Tomsick pulled this clause from is beyond me.

I file an appeal to remove dismissal. [November 13, 2002]
While I was at the court, I file an appeal to overturn the dismissal without prejudice.

Magistrate Tomsick rejects appeal and dismisses case with prejudice. [November 15, 2002]
Even though I told the courts I didn't want that dumb dyke to review my appeal, Magistrate Tomsick dismisses my case with prejudice. As anticipated, Magistrate Tomsick failed to follow Colorado Rules of County Civil Procedures Chapter 25 Rule 341 that states:

Actions not prosecuted or brought to trial with due diligence may, upon notice, be dismissed without prejudice As affirmed in Empiregas, Inc., of Pueblo v. County Court, 715 P.2d 937 (Colo. App. 1985).

The only reason for dismissal with prejudice would be if I failed to follow Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure pertaining to the administrative part of my case (e.g., properly served, properly filed, didn't pay fees, etc.). Per the case file, none of this pertains since I strictly followed Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure.

I file an appeal to overturn Magistrate Tomsick's ruling. [November 28, 2002]
Still waiting on a ruling.

I file a complaint with the Chief Judge. [December 2, 2002]
I file a complaint (Cocourtsareasham - PDF format click here) against Magistrate Tomsick. I also file the same complaint with the Office of Attorney Regulation (OAR).

I receive a call from an attorney with the OAR office. [December 16, 2002]
On December 16, 2002, I had a telephone conversation with Mr. Andrew Synchef, Esquire about my complaint against Magistrate Tomsick. While Mr. Synchef was professional and gracious enough, basically he told me by his actions that Magistrate Tomsick doesn't need to follow Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure. When I say his actions, basically our conversation was nothing more than a formality to show the board that they're investigating complaints since my complaint was left as we'll keep it on file for future reference. You'd think their department would at least take the time to look at the case file to investigate my complaint but it's obvious this isn't how their department operates.

The Colorado Judicial Performance Review asks me to clarify my complaint. [December 16, 2002]
The following is a copy of the letter (Cocourtsareasham - PDF format click here) I sent to the Judicial Performance Review.

I write the head of OAR. [December 16, 2002]
I write (Cocourtsareasham - PDF format click here) the head of OAR to tell him what I think of their "investigative" proceedings.

I receive a response to my complaints from the Judicial Performance Review. [March 10, 2003]
As I expected, the Judicial Performance Review failed to address the main points of my complaint. The following letter (Cocourtsareasham - PDF format click here) is their response to my complaint.

I respond to their response. [March 22, 2003]
I sent a letter (Cocourtsareasham - PDF format click here) to the Judicial Discipline Commission asking them to a) provide a copy of the arbitration clause (there never was an arbitration clause between myself and the defendants) they kept quoting and b) a copy of the law Magistrate Tomsick based her decision on. Moreover, I asked them why they didn't respond to the specific points of my complaint. I'm still waiting.

I establish this web site. [July 15, 2003]
I've established this web site in hopes of finding an attorney to take my case against Colorado for their failure to follow Colorado laws as well as the willful intent to deny me my rights of due process.


Google
WWW CoCourtsAreaSham


Flying J Sucks!

Disclaimer:
This content of this site is protected under the First Amendment Right to free speech. All communication with the site owner becomes property of this site and the communication could be posted on this site. The postings on the guestboards are the responsibilty of the individual poster and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the owner of this site. Under the CDA, this web site is deemed a content provider. Accordingly, the Supreme Court upheld in Zeran v. AOL, Inc that "[no] provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider. Distributor liability, or more precisely, liability for knowingly or negligently distributing defamatory material, is merely a species type of liability for publishing defamatory material. ... Properly understood, therefore, distributor liability treats a distributor as a "publisher" of third party statements where that distributor knew or had reason to know that the statements were defamatory. It follows that [plaintiff's] attempt to impose distributor liability on AOL is, in effect, an attempt to have AOL treated as the publisher of the defamatory material. This treatment is contrary to Section 230(c)(1) of the CDA and, thus, [plaintiff's] claim for negligent distribution of the notice is preempted". *The forums are provided as a service and some of the posts were generated by people not associated with this site and may not reflect the opinion of this site; moreover, the accuracy of the posts haven't been verified.