Page No 1

XXXXXXXX

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxx

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

March 22, 2003

Denver County Court Judicial Performance Commission

City and County Building

1437 Bannock St. Room 108

Denver, CO 80202

Re: Complaint against Magistrate Tomsick and Judge Satter.

Dear Denver County Court Judicial Performance Commission:

In response to your letter dated March 10th, 2003, you have completely failed to address

my complaint.

First of all, pursuant to Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure (CRCP), I filed my appeal with the next highest court which is Judge Satter’s jurisdiction.  As of today, the appeal has been completely ignored. Under Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure, Judge Satter is responsible to ensure that the administrative duties of the courts upheld. Even though the CRCP clearly states this, your response does a weak attempt to side skirt the CRCP.

Secondly, with respect to the complaint against Magistrate Tomsick, you’ve failed to

provide me the law which she based her dismissal. Moreover, you’ve failed to provide me with

the imaginary arbitration clause that she based her decision on. In addition, you have completely

failed to address my complaint with respect to the law I provided.

Thirdly, I agreed to confidentiality if you were to address my complaint in an unbiased

manner. Since you’ve failed to be unbiased, you’ve left me no choice but to scan in all the

documents and to setup a web site in the hopes I can hire an attorney from the site.

Please be advised you have 14 Days to provide the law the magistrate based her decision on as well as a copy of the arbitration cause she based her decision on as well as a response to the case law I provided to avoid any further action on my part.

Thank you in advance for you cooperation.

Regards,

xxxxxxxxxxxxx.

Top